<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Globe Gets It Backwards: National Health Reform Is Good For Massachusetts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hcfama.org/2010/06/22/globe-gets-it-backwards-national-health-reform-is-good-for-massachusetts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hcfama.org/2010/06/22/globe-gets-it-backwards-national-health-reform-is-good-for-massachusetts/</link>
	<description>The Ultimate Massachusetts Health Care Insider Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellescent Health Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.hcfama.org/2010/06/22/globe-gets-it-backwards-national-health-reform-is-good-for-massachusetts/#comment-3714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wellescent Health Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hcfama.org/?p=5386#comment-3714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nature of the study is one of immediate economics based on assumptions of how states will react to the changes introduced by reform. Unfortunately, such stories promote an agenda that focuses only on a subset of costs and entirely glosses over what is being gained for those monies that are being spent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nature of the study is one of immediate economics based on assumptions of how states will react to the changes introduced by reform. Unfortunately, such stories promote an agenda that focuses only on a subset of costs and entirely glosses over what is being gained for those monies that are being spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

