Committee Looks at E-Health Privacy Bill

The Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies held a hearing on Tuesday, June 9th which included S. 200, “An Act to Clarify and Enhance Privacy Protections for Electronic Health Records.” Check out our earlier post on this bill here. This bill has three main purposes: create routine privacy and security audits of electronic health record systems, establish enforcement mechanisms in case of violations of privacy, and compel security agents to report privacy violations.

Senator Marc Pacheco spoke first on the bill, highlighting the irony that when the bill originally was filed, the legislative electronic submissions system malfunctioned and only turned in the first part of the legislation. The Senator called Massachusetts’ embracement of e-health an exciting opportunity for the state to once again take the lead in a new medical area and save some money at the same time. However, he cautioned that this was also a time of concern for the subject of privacy, and while innovation is good, there must be a firewall to protect people’s privacy. In specific, he highlighted the bill’s provisions to ensure privacy audits and establish whistleblower protections.

Next, Gavi Wolf of the ACLU of Massachusetts spoke in favor of the bill. Wolf praised how the state has been forward thinking with its support of money saving, technologic innovation, and urged the legislature to equally think forward in terms of privacy. Wolf brought up the fact that it is no good to notify someone of a privacy invasion if no recourse can be taken and that this bill adds some teeth to privacy enforcement.

HCFA is submitting testimony to the Committee and has been working closely with bill authors Senator Pacheco and Representative Rushing, along with Mass ACLU and the AIDS Action Committee in support of this bill.
-Brian Schon

About HCFA

The Ultimate Massachusetts Health Care Insider Information
This entry was posted in E-health. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Committee Looks at E-Health Privacy Bill

  1. John Kaphal says:

    Its far easier to give suggestions than to implement.Legislation primarily focused on routine privacy and security audits of EHR(electronic health record)but the question arises about the money saving, technological innovation and invasion of privacy. People now-a-days very sensitive about the surity issues in medical arena, it is no doubt that the countries can get cost saving advantages but electronic transformations having extreme dangers of losing integrity, steps need to be taken essentially so that the countries will not suffering in manuevering.If not possible than to talk about the EHR is simply worthless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s