<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oral Health and Homeless Kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hcfama.org/2009/03/17/oral-health-and-homeless-kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hcfama.org/2009/03/17/oral-health-and-homeless-kids/</link>
	<description>The Ultimate Massachusetts Health Care Insider Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care Advocate</title>
		<link>http://blog.hcfama.org/2009/03/17/oral-health-and-homeless-kids/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Health Care Advocate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hcfama.org/?p=2566#comment-2265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I followed the link to the state-by-state data. It seems that at least some of the information about the health care part of their report for Massachusetts is wrong. They incorrectly list the FPL guidelines at 150% for our children. Maybe they don&#039;t take into account Family Assistance at 300% FPL. Also, their data on % of uninsured children seems a bit high at 5.1%]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed the link to the state-by-state data. It seems that at least some of the information about the health care part of their report for Massachusetts is wrong. They incorrectly list the FPL guidelines at 150% for our children. Maybe they don&#8217;t take into account Family Assistance at 300% FPL. Also, their data on % of uninsured children seems a bit high at 5.1%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

